Your browser doesn't support the features required by impress.js, so you are presented with a simplified version of this presentation.

For the best experience please use the latest Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser.

Bar-coding for Cytometry - How to multiplex samples to save reagents, costs and reduce batch effects

Bar-coding

What is it?

Staining individual samples in a unique way so that they can be identified for analysis even when mixed with other samples

  • Bar-coding allows us to multiplex - mix our samples together.
  • Stain and acquire ALL samples simultaneously
  • BUT still analyze each sample individually.

Why BARCODE?

  • Make work-flows more efficient
  • Stain and process one large sample
    • Can reduce acquisition time
    • Can reduce cell loss
    • Can reduce antibody requirements
  • Improve data consistency
    • By staining and processing all our samples together, we can
      • Minimise batch effects
      • Eliminate pipetting errors
      • Eliminate carryover from sample to sample
      • Provide additional and improved doublet discrimination
  • Enables scaled-up experiments
    • Reduces sample processing time

Why not BAR-CODE?

All of the benefits do not come for “free”

"While barcoding of samples has many benefits, it represents an additional step in the protocol, needs to be optimised on its own, and usually occupies cytometry channels which would otherwise be available to the measurement of target analytes."

Cossarizza et al. European Journal of Immunology, 47 (2017) 1584-1797

Why not BAR-CODE?

  • Integrating bar-codes into existing panels

    • Bar-coding reagents occupy the same channels as our targets
    • Bar-coding can have specific requirements like fixed cells
  • Limited number of barcodes

    • 12-20 barcodes
    • Fluorochrome selection
    • Instrument capability
  • Spillover

    • Bar-coding parameter spillover

How to Barcode

Each sample is tagged with a unique identifier.

In the case of flow cytometry, a specific dilution of one or two fluorescent dyes that react with all cells.

For mass cytometry we use several different approaches. We can use Palladium-tagged dyes or dilutions of pan-specific antibodies. In mass cytometry we can often use exclusive channels like the Palladium channels so that we don’t reduce the number of phenotypic antibodies we can use.

Current Barcoding Options

Flow Cytometry

There are 2 primary barcoding methods for flow cytoemtry samples:

  • Becton-Dickinson provides the Violet Fluorescence Barcoding Kit
    • BV421 and BV510 equivalent fluorophores are used (CBD 450 and CBD 500)
    • Up to 16 samples can be barcoded
    • kit is very easy to use
  • NHS-Ester dyes tagged with fluorophores such as Alexa Fluor or Cyanine dyes (avaialble from many manufacturers)
    • React with and stain ALL proteins on cells
    • Combine 2 different dyes
    • Can be titrated 3-5 times to provide 9-25 barcodes

Mass Cytometry

Palladium Bar-codes for universal cell multiplexing

  • Up to 20 samples can be barcoded using a 6 isotope - pick 3 format.

  • Since Palladium is not traditionally used for antibody staining we don’t lose channels when we integrate this kit into our work flow.
  • However, the kit only works only on fixed cells. You can choose when to bar-code though:
    • At very beginning
    • After surface stain
    • Just before acquisition

Mass Cytometry

Live cell CD45-based bar-coding

Uses anti-CD45 antibodies and 7 Cadmium and 4 Platinum-conjugated antibodies in an

  • 11 choose 3 (165 samples)
  • or 7 choose 3 (35 samples Cadmium Only) format.
  • Can be performed prior to marker staining.
  • CD45 is insensitive to fixation and allows optimal detection of fixation sensitive epitopes.
  • CD45 is not traditionally used for target markers so you can still use a large panel.
  • If utilising the platinum channels will need to change live-dead to Rhodium or another marker.

Mass Cytometry

Universal live cell barcoding for human samples

The Bendall lab at Stanford has explored alternative ways of barcoding non-haematopoietic samples.

  • Target ubiquitous molecules b2m and CD298
  • Non lanthanide isotopes used for barcoding leaves all normal phenotyping channels open
  • Unlike CD45, this approach is lineage independent so can be used for any cell types you need

References

1. Rodríguez-Martínez M, Hills SA, Diffley JFX, Svejstrup JQ. Multiplex cell fate tracking by flow cytometry. Methods and Protocols. 2020;3:1–9. doi:10.3390/mps3030050.
2. Skaanland SS. Phospho Flow Cytometry with Fluorescent Cell Barcoding for Single Cell Signaling Analysis and Biomarker Discovery. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. 2018;58386. doi:10.3791/58386.
3. Akkaya B, Miozzo P, Holstein AH, Shevach EM, Pierce SK, Akkaya M. A Simple, Versatile Antibody-Based Barcoding Method for Flow Cytometry. The Journal of Immunology. 2016;197:2027–38. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1600727.
4. Spurgeon BEJ, Naseem KM. Phosphoflow cytometry and barcoding in blood platelets: Technical and analytical considerations. 2020;98:123–30. doi:10.1002/cyto.b.21851.
5. Meng H, Warden A, Zhang L, Zhang T, Li Y, Tan Z, et al. A Mass-Ratiometry-Based CD45 Barcoding Method for Mass Cytometry Detection. SLAS Technology. 2019;24:408–19. doi:10.1177/2472630319834057.
6. Gaudillière B, Ganio EA, Tingle M, Lancero HL, Fragiadakis GK, Baca QJ, et al. Implementing Mass Cytometry at the Bedside to Study the Immunological Basis of Human Diseases: Distinctive Immune Features in Patients with a History of Term or Preterm Birth. Cytometry Part A. 2015;87:817–29. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.22720.